Free tool

Thirteen judgments on your storyboard. Under a second.

Upload your .docx or .pptx storyboard and get a structured instructional-design review: measurable objectives, content alignment, chunking, and assessment quality — before development starts.

  • Free, no account
  • Nothing stored
  • .docx and .pptx

Built with Jev (TypeSafe System One) How the analysis works

Storyboard Analyzer results showing an 85 out of 100 weighted ID score, 170 ms analysis time and a minor-revisions verdict
The weighted score, the verdict and the analysis time, at the top of every report.
Thirteen judgments. One request.
Well under a second A 150-screen deck comes back in about 400 ms. Most storyboards are faster.
No account, no limit No signup, no email, no upload cap. Open the page and drop a file.
Nothing stored Your file is held in memory for the analysis and discarded straight after.

The review gap

Most manual review exists because there was no fast way to get a structured opinion.

Storyboard review waits on a colleague's calendar and returns as prose you have to read, interpret and argue about. Meanwhile development either stalls, or starts on a storyboard nobody checked.

The usual loop

Days

Feedback that lands after the deadline.

A favor-based review returned as a long document, once the project has already moved on.

Storyboard Analyzer

<1s

A structured second opinion, on demand.

Thirteen typed judgments with scores and confidence levels, the moment you need them.

How it works

From storyboard file to revision plan in one pass.

Nothing to configure. The questions it answers are the ones a good instructional-design reviewer would ask.

01

Drop in your storyboard

A .docx or .pptx file. Speaker notes are read from decks; tables and headings from documents. Large storyboards are split and analyzed in parallel.

Every chunk still sees your objectives, so long decks score fairly.

The Storyboard Analyzer home page with a drop zone for a .docx or .pptx storyboard
Drop the file or choose it. The upload starts immediately.
02

Thirteen typed judgments

Are the objectives measurable? Does the content on every screen support them? Is it chunked for a human attention span? Do the knowledge checks test what they claim? Each judgment is a typed question with a defined rubric, so answers come back as scores and probabilities, not prose.

Anything under 50% confidence is flagged as a prompt to look yourself, not presented as a verdict.

Storyboard Analyzer report showing individual judgments with score bars, including accessibility planning, overall ID practice and the weakest-area ranking
Every judgment shows its score and the rubric level behind it.
03

One score, a weakest area, a recommendation

The judgments weigh into a single 0–100 ID score. You also get the one area that most needs revision and a clear next step: ready, minor revisions, major revisions, or redesign.

The weighting lives in code, so scoring the same storyboard twice gives the same answer.

The top of a Storyboard Analyzer report with the weighted ID score, analysis time and recommendation badge
Score, verdict and weakest area, before the detail.

What it checks

The same questions a good reviewer asks. Answered every time.

Thirteen judgments across four areas, each against a written rubric, so the review does not depend on who you managed to ask.

  • Learning objectives: stated, measurable, observable
  • Content: every screen mapped to an objective
  • Structure: chunking, cognitive load, sequencing
  • Engagement: interaction beyond clicking next
  • Assessment: presence, quality, feedback that explains why
  • ID practice: accessibility planning and overall design
Detail of a Storyboard Analyzer report showing rubric-based scores for assessment quality, accessibility and overall ID practice
Scores come with the rubric text, so you can see exactly what each level means.

Practical questions

Before you feed it your storyboard.

What files does it accept?

.docx and .pptx storyboards. For decks it reads every slide including speaker notes, where narration usually lives. For documents it reads tables and headings.

Is it really free?

Yes. No account, no upload limit, and nothing is stored: your file is held in memory for the analysis and discarded straight after. Nothing is written to disk.

How much should I trust a score from software?

Each judgment is a typed question with a written rubric, so answers are repeatable scores rather than impressions. Low-confidence answers are flagged instead of presented as verdicts. Treat it as a fast second opinion; your reviewers still make the call.

What about the finished course, not the storyboard?

That is what Review My eLearning is for: it collects stakeholder feedback from inside the built course, from Storyline, Captivate, Rise and the rest.

Storyboard Analyzer

Feed it your next storyboard.

Drop a .docx or .pptx and get thirteen structured judgments back in under a second.

Analyze my storyboard free → Free · No account · Nothing stored